Comments on: Quantum Probability and an old problem… http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/ Reality is but our dreams given form Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:58:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Andrew Milne http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1246 Andrew Milne Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:47:54 +0000 http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/#comment-1246 To be imovable you have to be indestructable. Imovable is not just at the macro scale but also at the micro scale. No componenet part or fraction can move. To break parts have to move in relation to other parts in a way not designed for. This would also make it very dificult to have a complex machine classes as imovable. To be imovable you have to be indestructable. Imovable is not just at the macro scale but also at the micro scale. No componenet part or fraction can move. To break parts have to move in relation to other parts in a way not designed for.

This would also make it very dificult to have a complex machine classes as imovable.

]]> By: Fluffy http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1237 Fluffy Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:46:50 +0000 http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/#comment-1237 Something about this old question has always bothered me, and thats the definition of "Immovable" and "Unstoppable". See, when I picture it in my head, I see this Immovable object quite happily not moving when it meets the Unstoppable force...and then smashing into itty bitty pieces. Is Immovable the same is indestructable? Would the unstobbable force not simply obliterate the obstinate little object thats just to dumb to get out of the way? Why does my head hurt? I like cheese.... Something about this old question has always bothered me, and thats the definition of “Immovable” and “Unstoppable”. See, when I picture it in my head, I see this Immovable object quite happily not moving when it meets the Unstoppable force…and then smashing into itty bitty pieces.

Is Immovable the same is indestructable? Would the unstobbable force not simply obliterate the obstinate little object thats just to dumb to get out of the way?

Why does my head hurt?

I like cheese….

]]> By: Lurch Kimded http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1230 Lurch Kimded Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:32:05 +0000 http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/#comment-1230 The macro, micro, and mega scale are merely an expansion of the Quantum scale, it is simply our perception that causes them to be seen as acting differently. (or something like that... haven't got far enough in the book yet) :) The macro, micro, and mega scale are merely an expansion of the Quantum scale, it is simply our perception that causes them to be seen as acting differently. (or something like that… haven’t got far enough in the book yet) :)

]]> By: Andrew Milne http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1229 Andrew Milne Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:41:23 +0000 http://www.realityofdreams.org.uk/2006/12/11/quantum-probability-and-an-old-problem/#comment-1229 How does your response change at the macro, micro and mega scales? Remembering that larger objects may experience all possible results at the same time due to their composite nature. :P How does your response change at the macro, micro and mega scales? Remembering that larger objects may experience all possible results at the same time due to their composite nature.
:P

]]>